Review appointment, removal and service contract separately.
Read the articles, notice, majority rule and exact resolution wording together. The corporate office and an existing service contract may produce different legal consequences.
A managing-director change requires separate coordination of the resolution, authority, company register and operational handover.
Your shareholder dispute team
Dispute team for shareholders and managing directors
A shareholder dispute calls for corporate law, litigation strategy and commercial understanding from one team. Mag. Bernhard Brandauer is responsible for the legal advice; depending on the conflict, further specialised lawyers of the firm support safeguards, evidence, negotiations and court enforcement.
Contact the teamA new managing director has been appointed, but the former management withholds records or disputes the removal. In that situation, office, authority, the company register and actual access must be reviewed separately.
Plan the change through the correct shareholder resolution, the register filing, the revision of bank and system rights and an evidentially secure handover. This keeps the GmbH operational while contractual and liability questions are reviewed on their own terms.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Read the articles, notice, majority rule and exact resolution wording together. The corporate office and an existing service contract may produce different legal consequences.
The change in management must be filed with the company register without delay. Also sequence the effective date, the authority rules and the revision of bank and signing rights.
Record open matters, contracts, bank records, devices, keys and digital permissions. Identify specific endangered actions if interim protective relief is being considered.
A GmbH managing director is generally appointed by shareholder resolution or under a provision in the articles. Revocation of the appointment is governed by section 16 GmbHG. The appointment basis, notice, required majority and exact resolution wording therefore matter together.
The corporate office describes the function for the GmbH. The service or employment contract governs remuneration, termination, release and handover duties. Removal does not end that contract automatically. The related article on removing a managing director for cause explains the court route and interim protection when a majority is unavailable.
The change in management must be filed with the company register without delay. Section 17 GmbHG addresses the filing and evidence of the change. Resolution, receipt, effective date and register filing should therefore be kept in one chronology.
The register position and the internal corporate decision answer different questions. Section 18 GmbHG also requires the authority rule and the specific signing power to be considered. Banks, contracting parties and authorities need clear information about who may act for the GmbH.
A handover list should record contracts, bank and accounting records, open payments, personnel matters, keys, devices, storage media and pending proceedings. Add the date, condition, handing person and receiving person. For digital data, also record location, permissions and the time of preservation.
A joint handover is useful, but a reliable record can also be built when it is refused. Record the refused items, available substitute evidence and the specific effect on the business. General statements about a dispute do not show which protective measure is required.
First establish whether another managing director with sufficient authority remains in office. If necessary management is missing, a court appointment under section 15a GmbHG may be considered in urgent cases. The specific gap in authority, the action that cannot wait and the temporary purpose must be explained.
When payments, asset transfers or deletion of data are imminent, the claim, risk and requested protection must fit together. The shareholder-dispute safeguard check helps structure these points for further review. A general description of the conflict is not a substitute for specific facts.
For the change, collect the articles, register extract, appointment or removal resolution, notices and minutes. Add the service contract and amendments, authority rules, bank records and a list of open matters. Preserve these records in their original form and record when they were secured.
Any liability for earlier management must be reviewed separately. A breach of duty, loss and causal connection require specific evidence. The change itself does not prove liability. Likewise, an unresolved handover does not establish personal responsibility. This keeps the corporate-office question, contractual claims and liability review distinct.
No. Registration and the internal corporate decision are separate stages. Resolution, effective date, filing and authority must be placed in one chronology.
Not automatically. The corporate office and the service or employment contract are separate legal relationships. Remuneration, termination and handover duties require separate review.
Important records include the articles, resolutions, register documents, contracts, bank and accounting records, open matters, devices, keys and documented digital access rights.
Receive new articles and legal information from the firm through BRANDaktuelle Rechtsnews.
Safeguard, challenge and enforce shareholder disputes. Portal for active GmbH conflicts covering first safeguards, resolution challenge, exclusion and preliminary injunction.
Contact